We seek to understand more about domestic and family violence and sexual assault, and determine the effectiveness of strategies to make our communities safer for all.
Review the outcome measurement tools and processes used by WHWSS providers to promote consistency and improve the information available to government and service providers about outcomes for women accessing WHWBSS
QCDFVR was commissioned to evaluate the early implementation of the Women’s Health and Wellbeing Support Services (WHWSS) during 2019-2020. Existing services are funded to deliver WHWSS to support women’s longer-term recovery from gender-based violence which was identified as a gap in service delivery by the Queensland Government’s Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence (the Taskforce, 2015).
The evaluation findings across 10 sites demonstrated the high need and value of WHWSS services. While providers developed a range of place-based service delivery models, there were many common elements of good practice to support women’s longer-term recovery. It is important to consider how these practices work together as a system of support and provide mutually reinforcing benefits for women. The findings regarding WHWSS service design and delivery highlighted the following enablers of this ‘support system’ for women:
Service approaches/philosophy: client-led, trauma-informed, empowerment approaches, practice informed by a DFV lens
Service types: multi-dimensional with mix of case management, therapeutic counselling, group programs, workshops/information sessions and social connection activities
Service structures: open, multiple entry points on journey from crisis to recovery, flexible, free, tailored to client needs, availability of long-term counselling to heal trauma
Integration into local service system: referral networks that enable access into WHWSS and referrals to other services women need including DFV crisis services; collaborative partnerships to broaden types of services offered to women
Place based: responsive to local needs and context
Culturally responsive: engaging with local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and Culturally and Linguistically Diverse communities and providers.
TIMEFRAME: July 2021 – June 2022
The Queensland Government commissioned QCDFVR to evaluate the appropriateness and impact of the Queensland Indigenous Family Violence Prevention Forum and provide an evaluation report with recommendations for future QIFVP Forum models. The evaluation looked at the past 5 years of annual Forums with methods including desktop/document review and analysis as well as interviews and focus groups of Indigenous Advisory Group members of the Forum, purposive sample of participants of the Forum and QCDFVR staff involved in planning/facilitating the Forums over the past 5 years.
TIMEFRAME: June 2020 – July 2021
SPONSOR: Department of Justice and the Attorney General
The Queensland Indigenous Family Violence Legal Service (QIFVLS) developed their Case Management Practice (CMP) service to support clients engaging with their legal service since 2016. In 2019 QIFLVS engaged QCDFVR to review their CMP monitoring and evaluation tools and collaboratively develop an evaluation framework with QIFVLS.
In 2021 QIFVLS commissioned QCDFVR to conduct a process and outcome evaluation to identify the outcomes for CMP clients and what they consider have been the most important benefits of the CMP service. A process evaluation examined what was working well and suggestions for improvement from the perspective of clients, QIFVLS managers and staff, and key stakeholders. A case study was conducted in Rockhampton as the CMP service had been operating in this area the longest allowing us to examine the community connections and impact.
Our evaluation approach worked collaboratively with QIFVLS to co-design and implement this evaluation. We were culturally guided by our key contact at QIFVLS, Aunty Bino Toby, the QIFVLS Board, and our Indigenous researcher on the evaluation team, Jamie Anderson. Other members of the evaluation team were Dr Sue Carswell and Dr Vicki Lowik. Dr Heather Lovatt, QCDFVR Director had oversight.
TIMEFRAME: September 2021 – August 2022
SPONSOR: Queensland Indigenous Family Violence Legal Service (QIFVLS)
TIMEFRAME: September 2021 – August 2023
The Red Rose Foundation has taken a significant lead in putting non-fatal strangulation on the public agenda. Prior experience of non-fatal strangulation increases six-fold the chances of becoming a victim of attempted domestic homicide, and seven-fold the chances of becoming a victim of domestic homicide (Glass et al., 2009). In September 2021, the Red Rose Foundation launched the Strangulation Trauma Centre (STC) to provide immediate and long-term support, counselling, and systems advocacy for women who have experienced non-fatal strangulation. The Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General (DJAG) commissioned the Queensland Centre for Domestic and Family Violence Research (QCDFVR) to evaluate a twelve-month trial of the Strangulation Trauma Centre (January 2022-January 2023). This trial was an Australian first.